ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2025
Catheter tensile test: An in vitro evaluation for transradial access.
Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PurposeTransradial access (TRA) has been established for neurointervention; however, complications can occur at the radial access site. Radial artery spasm (RAS) is the most common complication of TRA. Under severe RAS conditions, pulling a catheter may occasionally result in radial artery injury and emergency surgery may be required. There have been no reports on the behavior of entrapped catheters/sheaths when pulled under severe RAS conditions. We conducted tensile tests on guide sheaths and balloon guide catheters to observe their damage in vitro and evaluate their potential to cause vascular injury.MethodsSix types of guide sheaths and balloon guide catheters were used in the test. The catheters were fixed to the testing machine and pulled. We observed how the catheter stretched and fractured. Additionally, a stress-strain curve was obtained from each examination to compare the characteristics of the catheters.ResultsCatheters were damaged in various ways. Some catheters were simply lengthened, whereas others were partially or completely torn. In the evaluation of the stress-strain curves, the slopes of the curves were almost equal among the catheters at the beginning of the test; that is, the hardness was almost the same for each catheter. As the strain increased, each exhibited different behavior.ConclusionCatheters can be damaged in various ways by stretching, which can cause vascular injuries. Neurointerventionists should be aware of possible catheter damage and vascular injury when catheters are entrapped.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.