Observational studyEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy2025
Ranolazine in patients with chronic coronary syndromes: real-world data provide new evidence on the antiarrhythmic properties of the drug.
Observational study in European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The present and future of antiarrhythmic drugs.JRSM cardiovascular diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsRanolazine (Ran) is an anti-anginal drug inhibiting late sodium current, an action possibly hindering arrhythmias onset. Indeed, some evidence supports the anti-arrhythmic effects of Ran. The aim of this study, which evaluated Italian patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), was to investigate whether Ran, as an add-on therapy, was associated with a lower incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) compared with no-Ran prescription (No-Ran). METHODS AND
resultsThe original population (N = 6.1 million) derived from the databases of the Italian National Health System; information concerned hospitalizations with the related diagnoses, drug therapy, follow-up clinical events and visits. Patients hospitalized between 2011 and 2020 for any cause and discharged with an ICD-9-CM CCS code were studied if AF had not been diagnosed before. The follow-up duration was 4.4 and 5.0 years for the Ran and the No-Ran cohorts, respectively. Study subjects were 171 015 (mean age: 72 years; men: 66%; Ran: N = 22 207; No-Ran: N = 148 808). After propensity score matching, Ran (N = 6384) and No-Ran (N = 25 536) cohorts were similar for age, sex, comorbidities and drug therapy. AF incidence during follow-up was 5.3% and 9.6% in the Ran and in the No-Ran cohorts, respectively, with a 41% drug-related lower risk of arrhythmia development in the Cox model (HR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.53-0.67, P < 0.001). Also, Ran correlated with reduced incidence of brady-arrhythmias (P = 0.001) and ventricular tachy-arrhythmias (P = 0.049), and with lower mortality (P < 0.001).
conclusionOur study, performed in a subset of the Italian CCS population, showed that Ran therapy was safe and associated with a long-term reduced AF incidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.