ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2026
Retinotopic Spatial Working Memory Representations Are Not Affected by Task-irrelevant Visual Stimuli.
Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Visual working memory (WM) enables the maintenance and manipulation of information no longer accessible in the world. Previous research has identified spatial WM representations in sustained activation patterns in visual, parietal, and frontal cortex, while MEG/EEG studies have additionally supported a role for "activity-silent" mechanisms revealed by transient reactivation or amplification of an existing representation by a task-irrelevant "ping" stimulus. In natural vision, the delay period between encoding information into WM and its use to guide behavior is rarely "empty," as is the case in many laboratory experiments. Instead, eye movements, movement of the individual, and events in the environment result in visual inputs that may overwrite or impair the fidelity of WM representations, especially in early sensory cortices. Here, we evaluated the extent to which a brief, irrelevant interrupting visual stimulus presented during a spatial WM delay period impaired behavioral performance and retinotopic WM representation fidelity assayed using an inverted encoding model. On each trial, participants (both sexes) viewed two target dots and were immediately postcued to remember the precise spatial position of one dot. On 50% of trials, a brief interrupter stimulus appeared. While we observed strong transient univariate visual responses to the interrupter stimulus, we saw no change in reconstructed neural WM representations due to this interruption, nor a change in behavioral performance on a continuous recall task. This suggests that spatial WM representations can be robust to interference from incoming task-irrelevant visual information, perhaps related to their role in guiding movements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.