Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41026849›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2025

DeePFAS: Deep-Learning-Enabled Rapid Annotation of PFAS: Enhancing Nontargeted Screening through Spectral Encoding and Latent Space Analysis.

Heng Wang, Tien-Chueh Kuo, Yufeng Jane Tseng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Heng WangDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.
Tien-Chueh KuoThe Metabolomics Core Laboratory, Centers of Genomic and Precision Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4794-0134
Yufeng Jane TsengDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-8461-6181

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detecting PFAS is challenging due to their diverse chemical structures, lack of standards, complex sample matrices, and the need for sensitive equipment to measure trace levels. Background contamination and the sheer number of PFAS further hinder the development of a universal detection method. Liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) is the primary tool capable of analyzing PFAS in water, soil, and biological samples, and it is widely adopted in regulatory testing. However, LC-HRMS faces challenges, including contamination risk, labor-intensive preparation, low detection limits, and time-consuming data processing that requires advanced software and expertise to distinguish structurally similar compounds. To overcome these obstacles, we present DeePFAS, a deep-learning-based method for rapid annotation of PFAS. DeePFAS employs a spectral encoder integrating convolutional and transformer architectures to project raw MS2 spectra into a latent space of chemical structural features learned from a large corpus of unlabeled compounds. DeePFAS enables efficient annotation of MS2 spectra by comparing latent representations with candidate molecules, streamlining large-scale nontargeted PFAS screening, and reducing analytical complexity. Our method demonstrates the potential of AI-driven tools in environmental chemistry and is available at https://github.com/CMDM-Lab/DeePFAS.

Indexed as

Deep LearningFluorocarbonsChromatography, LiquidMass SpectrometryFluorocarbonschemically latent spacedeep learningenvironmental analysismass spectrometryPFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances)

Identifiers

PMID41026849
PMCPMC12659435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.