ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2026
A Noise-Robust Model-Based Approach to T-Wave Amplitude Measurement and Alternans Detection.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveT-wave alternans (TWA) is a potential marker for sudden cardiac death, but its reliable analysis is often constrained to noise-free environments, limiting its utility in real-world settings. We explore model-based T-wave estimation and detection to mitigate noise effects on TWA.
methodsDetection was performed using a surrogate-based method as a benchmark and a new approach based on a Markov model state transition matrix (STM). Estimation employed a Modified Moving Average (MMA) and polynomial T-wave modeling to improve noise robustness. Methods were evaluated across signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) from -5 to 30 dB and noise types: baseline wander, muscle artifacts (MA), electrode movement (EM), and respiratory modulation. Synthetic ECGs with known TWA levels were used: 0 $\bm \mu$V for TWA-free and 30-72 $\bm \mu$V for TWA-present.
resultsT-wave modeling improved estimation accuracy under noisy conditions. With MA noise at SNRs of -5 and 5 dB, mean absolute error (MAE) dropped from 62 to 49 $\bm \mu$V and 27 to 25 $\bm \mu$V, respectively (Mann-Whitney U test, $\bm {p < 0.05}$). Similar improvements occurred with EM noise: MAE decreased from 101 to 71 and 26 to 23 $\bm \mu$V. In detection, STM achieved sensitivity of 0.87, outperforming the surrogate-based method (0.70), though both struggled under EM noise at -5 dB. Detection performance also depended on the number of beats analyzed.
conclusionThese findings show that applying model-based estimation and STM detection could improve TWA analysis under noise, supporting application in ambulatory and wearable ECG monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.