Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41026813›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

The impact of air pollution on petcare utilization.

Stephen Jarvis, Olivier Deschenes, Akshaya Jha, Alan D Radford

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Air pollution across One Health domains.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2026
    Article
  2. Veterinarians and air pollution: Rethinking what we've learned in a burning world.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2026
    Article
  3. The impact of air pollution on petcare utilization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephen JarvisDepartment of Geography and Environment, London School of Economics, London WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9039-3407
Olivier DeschenesDepartment of Economics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106.ORCID 0000-0002-8737-0068
Akshaya JhaNational Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, MA 02138.ORCID 0000-0001-6393-5397
Alan D RadfordInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Neston, Wirral, L69 3BX, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Air pollution is one of the leading causes of morbidity and premature mortality globally. A large literature documents the adverse impacts of ambient air pollution on human health. In contrast, there is a lack of comparable research studying the effects of air pollution on animal health. We fill this gap, utilizing 5 y of data on over seven million visits to veterinary practices across the United Kingdom. Leveraging within-city variation in daily monitor-measured air pollution levels, we find that increases in fine particulate matter (i.e., PM

Indexed as

Air PollutionPetsAir PollutantsAnimalsCatsDogsEnvironmental MonitoringHumansParticulate MatterUnited KingdomAir PollutantsParticulate Matterair pollutionanimal healthpetcare utilizationpets

Identifiers

PMID41026813
PMCPMC12519225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.