ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices on anthrax in selected game management areas in Zambia.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward anthrax prevention and control in Ethiopia: Implication for a one health policy.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we investigated anthrax, a zoonotic disease, at the human-wildlife-livestock interface in Zambia, focusing on Simalaha Conservancy, Blue Lagoon, and Lochinvar National Parks. These areas represent key points where illegal wildlife trade and anthrax risk coexist. Although anthrax remains endemic in Zambia, there is limited data on community knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAPs) related to anthrax transmission and the role of wildlife trade value chains in its spread and maintenance. Therefore, we examined how these community KAPs influence anthrax transmission through the illegal game meat trade. We conducted a cross-sectional study involving 1,187 participants and analyzed data using descriptive statistics and logistic regression. Our findings revealed significant variations between knowledge of anthrax and behavior. While more than 80% of respondents demonstrated positive attitudes and safe practices, their knowledge of anthrax remained limited. Specifically, 72.5% of participants had low awareness of the disease, yet 82.1% acknowledged its severity, and 59.4% recognized vaccination as a control measure. Despite these positive attitudes, misconceptions about anthrax transmission and treatment were widespread. Some community members relied on spiritual or herbal remedies rather than seeking medical intervention. We also identified several risky behaviors that contribute to anthrax transmission. Notably, 14.9% of respondents admitted to consuming meat from animals that had died suddenly, while 46.3% reported handling potentially infected carcasses or animal products without taking safety precautions. We found strong correlations between knowledge, attitudes, practices, and education levels. Our results showed that prior exposure to anthrax information was the strongest predictor of knowledge (β > 1). Our findings highlight the urgent need for targeted public health interventions, improved veterinary services, and stricter enforcement of wildlife trade regulations to reduce the risk of anthrax transmission in these communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.