Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41026779›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2025

From individuals to ancestries: Towards attributing trait variation to haplotypes.

Yaoling Yang, Daniel J Lawson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yaoling YangInstitute for Statistical Science, School of Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4905-8097
Daniel J LawsonInstitute for Statistical Science, School of Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5311-6213

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have revolutionized our understanding of the genetic basis of complex traits and diseases, but limitations in SNP-centric approaches to population stratification limit the resolution of fine-scale population structures. Here we consider the use of haplotypes to represent population structure, leveraging haplotype components (HCs) for an improved understanding of trait associations and adjustment for population stratification. Using data from the UK Biobank, we showed that HCs have stronger associations with a range of phenotypes than principal components (PCs) while containing more predictive power for birthplaces globally. In GWAS, HCs-correction identifies more genome-wide significant association signals for birthplace and lifestyle-related phenotypes, which are missed by PCs-corrected GWAS. Through thorough testing and simulation, we highlight challenges in performing ancestry-specific GWAS, underscoring the critical role of accurate local ancestry inference in studying admixed populations. We analyzed the haplotype structure of the UK Biobank in terms of 93 genetically-distinct populations, which enabled the computation of Ancestral Risk Scores (ARS) across 8 continental populations, providing insights into population-specific genetic risks for traits and diseases. By integrating haplotype information, this framework provides the potential to address challenges in population stratification, enhances GWAS resolution, and supports equitable health research by facilitating genetic studies in diverse populations.

Indexed as

HaplotypesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetics, PopulationGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrincipal Component AnalysisUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID41026779
PMCPMC12507255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.