ArticlePloS one2025
Information bounds on the accuracy of cell polarization.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Here we characterized an information measure for cell polarity that applies to non-motile cells responding to a chemical gradient. The central idea is that polarization represents information about the direction of the gradient. We applied a theory of optimal gradient sensing and response in the presence of external noise based on the information capacity of a Gaussian channel. First, we formulated an information framework that describes spatial gradient sensing and polarization response. As part of this section, we modeled ligand diffusion and receptor-binding dynamics as a mixed Poisson distribution, confirming the single receptor accuracy limits derived by ten Wolde and colleagues. Second, we performed numerical calculations of stochastic ligand levels at the cell surface to estimate the information provided about the directional component of the gradient vector, which was close to the Gaussian channel bound for low signal-to-noise ratios. Third, we used the information framework to evaluate the noise-robustness of three generic models of cell polarity, demonstrating that a filter-amplifier architecture and time integration can attenuate the detrimental impact of noise on polarity so that the model can approach the theoretical limits. Fourth, we compared the theory to published experimental data on yeast mating projection growth in a pheromone gradient, identifying the ligand association rate and integration time as two key parameters affecting directional accuracy. By varying these parameters, we showed that for certain ranges the theory is roughly in agreement with the data, and that the slow binding rate constant is a key limiting factor. We concluded that temporal averaging can help overcome the slow binding rate to achieve greater accuracy, but with the drawback of a slow mating response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.