ArticlePloS one2025
Breathwork and holistic wellbeing: A protocol for a scoping review.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breathwork has great potential for supporting connections to self, others, and nature, laying the foundations for individual, collective, and planetary wellbeing. While reviews have summarised the impacts of a wide range of breathwork techniques on outcomes relating to individual wellbeing, past work has neglected broader contexts. Here we present a protocol for a scoping review to identify and summarise the available literature relating to a broader range of wellbeing domains, focused on connection to self (individual wellbeing), others (collective wellbeing), and nature (planetary wellbeing). In synthesising the literature, we will determine how and when holistic wellbeing might arise through breathing interventions. Guided by standardised guidelines for conducting scoping reviews, six electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, APAPsycArticles, Psychology and Behavioural Sciences Collection and Cochrane), grey literature and reference lists of included literature will be searched. Using the Rayyan platform, two reviewers will independently screen title/abstracts after which the full texts of relevant articles will be reviewed based on predetermined criteria. Study details, breathing intervention type and wellbeing outcomes relevant to the research question(s) will be extracted. Numerical analysis of data items and descriptive qualitative analysis of data across the three domains will be reported. Preliminary results will be shared with breathwork facilitators, and their feedback will help highlight gaps not explored in the literature and to refine discussion of the findings in an applied context. We hope that results will inform subsequent research and encourage deeper reflection on the role of breathwork across wider contexts. This research will contribute to the growing evidence base for promoting the inner development of individuals and communities focused on major societal challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.