Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41026745›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Gain modulation of probabilistic selection without synaptic relearning.

Elif Köksal-Ersöz, Pascal Chossat, Frédéric Lavigne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elif Köksal-ErsözInria, Villeurbanne, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3696-7953
Pascal ChossatMathNeuro Project-Team, Inria Branch of the University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Frédéric LavigneMathNeuro Project-Team, Inria Branch of the University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Funding

Hebbian ANR-project ANR-23-CE28-0008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adaptation of behavior requires the brain to change goals in a changing environment. Synaptic learning has shown its effectiveness in changing the probability of selecting actions based on their outcome. In the extreme case, it is vital not to repeat an action to a given goal that led to harmful punishment. The present model proposes a simple neural mechanism of gain modulation that makes possible immediate changes in the probability of selecting a goal after punishment of variable intensity. The results show how gain modulation determines the type of elementary navigation process within the state space of a network of neuronal populations of excitatory neurons regulated by inhibition. Immediately after punishment, the system can avoid the punished populations by going back or jumping to unpunished populations. This does not require particular credit assignment at the 'choice' population (the branching node) but only modulation of the gain of units active at the time of punishment (at the end of the punished branch). In this way, gain modulation encodes memories of past experiences that change behavior without modification of synaptic efficacies. This neuronal non-synaptic learning mechanism does not require statistical relearning. It helps the system not repeat harmful choices that may lead to further punishments. Thus, such a neuronal learning mechanism can complement synaptic plasticity.

Indexed as

LearningModels, NeurologicalSynapsesAnimalsHumansNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsProbabilityPunishment

Identifiers

PMID41026745
PMCPMC12483250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.