ArticlePloS one2025
Application of machine learning models in predicting physical literacy in 4-6-year-old children: A comprehensive analysis of individual and family factors.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physical literacy in children has become a significant research topic in both education and psychology. Recently, machine learning, as a cutting-edge AI technology, has started to play a crucial role in these fields. This study aimed to apply machine learning models to predict physical literacy in 4-6-year-old children and to comprehensively analyze the influence of individual and family factors. We evaluated the physical literacy of 1,734 children aged 4-6 and systematically examined the impact of both individual factors (such as gender, age, body type, sedentary behavior, screen time, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), sleep duration, and sleep quality) and family factors (such as parents' education level, occupation, exercise frequency, support for children's physical activity, household annual income, and family exercise environment) using various machine learning models. Results showed that the ensemble learning model achieved the best performance in predicting physical literacy, with an AUC of 86.2%. Among all predictive factors, mother's exercise frequency, family exercise environment, and time spent on MVPA were identified as the most important. These findings provide new insights into enhancing children's physical literacy and underscore the critical role of family environment and lifestyle in its development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.