Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41026532›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral addictions2025

Research priorities in gambling: Findings of a large-scale expert study.

Andrea Czakó, Marc N Potenza, David C Hodgins, Shu M Yu, Anise M S Wu, Susana Jiménez-Murcia, Henrietta Bowden-Jones, Daniel King, Joël Billieux, Beáta Bőthe and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Andrea Czakó1 Centre of Excellence in Responsible Gaming, University of Gibraltar, Gibraltar, Gibraltar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4525-0524
Marc N Potenza3 Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6323-1354
David C Hodgins9 Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2737-5200
Shu M Yu1 Centre of Excellence in Responsible Gaming, University of Gibraltar, Gibraltar, Gibraltar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5738-1367
Anise M S Wu10 Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8174-6581
Susana Jiménez-Murcia12 Clinical Psychology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3596-8033
Henrietta Bowden-Jones16 Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9314-3697
Daniel King19 School of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1762-2581
Joël Billieux21 Institute of Psychology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7388-6194
Beáta Bőthe23 Département de Psychologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2718-4703
Dan J Stein24 SAMRC Unit on Risk & Resilience in Mental Disorders, Dept of Psychiatry & Neuroscience Institute, University of Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7218-7810
Gambling Research Priority Setting Consortium
Zsolt Demetrovics20 Flinders University Institute for Mental Health and Wellbeing, College of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5604-7551

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: While gambling is a growing public health concern, research resources are limited, and no guidance is available to prioritise research. This study aimed to identify priorities for gambling research on a global scale using a systematic, transparent, and democratic methodology to inform researchers and other stakeholders. Methods: Leading gambling researchers were invited to list gambling-related research questions that can contribute to strengthening evidence-based policy, prevention, and effective early intervention and treatment of problem gambling. Suggestions were consolidated into research options and evaluated against six criteria (Answerability, Feasibility, Effectiveness, Impact on equity and an additional two based on the category of research options: Novelty and Relevance for description-type, Potential for burden reduction and Deliverability for intervention-related options). Stakeholders (n = 14) assigned relative weights to each criterion, and options were ranked according to their weighted research priority scores. Results: With input from 46.9% of eligible researchers (n = 307) from 35 countries, 1,361 questions were consolidated into 102 options. Evaluations showed strong agreement between experts, and the top 25 priorities were identified. The results highlight the need for further knowledge about the epidemiology, etiology, and consequences of problem gambling. Top-priority topics indicate the importance of focusing on vulnerable and minority groups, youth, significant others, technological innovations, advertisements, the convergence of gaming and gambling, and co-occurring conditions. Evaluating and tailoring existing measures were prioritised more highly than new interventions, and identifying factors underlying treatment seeking, drop-out and relapse was also considered a priority. Conclusions: This initiative successfully involved the global research community in identifying gambling research priorities. The results provide information for researchers and other stakeholders for future projects and funding.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchGamblingResearchHumansaddictive behaviorbehavioral addictioncompulsive behaviorexpert studygamblinggambling disorderimpulsive behaviorinterventionpolicypreventionresearch prioritiestreatment

Identifiers

PMID41026532
PMCPMC12486284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.