ArticleGigaScience2025
Foundation model of electronic medical records for adaptive risk estimation.
Article in GigaScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Evaluation and Comparison of Latent Health Risk Prediction Models for Clinical Triage: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Article
- Toward scalable early cancer detection: evaluating EHR-based predictive models against traditional screening criteria.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Quantifying surprise in clinical care: Detecting highly informative events in electronic health records with foundation models.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHospitals struggle to predict critical outcomes. Traditional early warning systems, like NEWS and MEWS, rely on static variables and fixed thresholds, limiting their adaptability, accuracy, and personalization.
methodsWe previously developed the Enhanced Transformer for Health Outcome Simulation (ETHOS), an artificial intelligence (AI) model that tokenizes patient health timelines (PHTs) from electronic health records and uses transformer-based architectures to predict future PHTs. ETHOS is a versatile framework for developing a wide range of applications. In this work, we develop the Adaptive Risk Estimation System (ARES) that leverages ETHOS to compute dynamic, personalized risk probabilities for clinician-defined critical events. ARES also features a personalized explainability module that highlights key clinical factors influencing risk estimates. We evaluated ARES using the MIMIC-IV v2.2 dataset, together with its emergency department extension, and benchmarked performance against both classical early warning systems and contemporary machine learning models.
resultsThe entire dataset was tokenized, resulting in 285,622 PHTs (63% with at least 1 hospital admission), comprising over 357 million tokens. ETHOS outperformed benchmark models in predicting hospital admissions, intensive care unit admissions, and prolonged stays, achieving superior area under the curve scores. Its risk estimates were robust across demographic subgroups, with calibration curves confirming model reliability. The explainability module provided valuable insights into patient-specific risk factors.
conclusionsARES, powered by ETHOS, advances predictive health care AI by delivering dynamic, real-time, personalized risk estimation with patient-specific explainability. Although our results are promising, the clinical impact remains uncertain. Demonstrating ARES's true utility in real-world settings will be the focus of our future work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.