ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2025
Characterization and automated classification of sentences in the biomedical literature: a case study for biocuration of gene expression and protein kinase activity.
Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence as a Discovery Engine for Routine Molecular Techniques: Extracting Biological Insight from Western Blotting, ELISA, Immunostaining, and Immunoprecipitation.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence agents for biological research: a survey.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- The Gene Ontology knowledgebase in 2026.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- AI in biocuration: challenges, opportunities, and a roadmap for sustainable integration.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biological knowledgebases are essential resources for biomedical researchers, providing ready access to gene function and genomic data. Professional, manual curation of knowledgebases, however, is labour-intensive and thus high-performing machine learning (ML) methods that improve biocuration efficiency are needed. Here, we report on sentence-level classification to identify biocuration-relevant sentences in the full text of published references for two gene function data types: gene expression and protein kinase activity. We performed a detailed characterization of sentences from references in the WormBase bibliography and used this characterization to define three tasks for classifying sentences as either (i) fully curatable, (ii) fully and partially curatable, or (iii) all language-related. We evaluated various ML models applied to these tasks and found that GPT and BioBERT achieve the highest average performance, resulting in F1 performance scores ranging from 0.89 to 0.99 depending upon the task. Moreover, our inter-annotator agreement analyses and curator timing exercises demonstrated that curators readily converged on classification of high-quality training sentences that take a relatively short period of time to collect, making expansion of this approach to other data types a realistic addition to existing biocuration workflows. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of extracting biocuration-relevant sentences from full text. Integrating these models into professional biocuration workflows, such as those used by the Alliance of Genome Resources and the ACKnowledge community curation platform, might well facilitate efficient and accurate annotation of the biomedical literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.