ArticleJAMA network open2025
Race and Disability Characteristics and Accommodation Disparities on the USMLE Step 1.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Ensuring access to accommodations on high-stakes examinations is crucial for ensuring equal opportunity for medical students with disabilities (MSWD). Objective: To examine the associations between gender, race and ethnicity, disability type, timing of disability diagnosis, and access to specialized disability resource professionals (DRPs) with accommodation requests and approvals on the US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional study of MSWD who graduated between 2020 and 2023 was conducted across 9 US MD-granting medical schools. Variables included deidentified student data (ie, gender, race and ethnicity, disability type, and timing of diagnosis, either before or after matriculation) and presence of specialized DRPs. Exposure: Diagnosis of a disability. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was USMLE Step 1 accommodation request and approval. χ2, Fisher exact, and post hoc pairwise tests were used to assess the associations between gender, race and ethnicity, disability type, timing of diagnosis, presence of specialized DRPs, and accommodation requests and approval. Results: Among 295 MSWD in the cohort (189 female [64%]), 41 (15%) identified as Asian, 162 (59%) as White, and 70 (26%) as underrepresented in medicine (URiM; ie, American Indian, Alaska Native, Black or African American, Hispanic, or Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander). One hundred five students (36%) reported a psychological disability, 167 (58%) received a diagnosis before medical school matriculation, and 120 (41%) requested Step 1 accommodations. A higher proportion of White students requested Step 1 accommodations than Asian students (74 White students [46%] compared with 8 Asian students [20%]). No difference in Step 1 accommodation request rate was found for URiM students compared with White students. Compared with medical students with psychological disability (31 students [30%]), a higher proportion of students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (36 students [50%]) and chronic health conditions (27 students [53%]) requested Step 1 accommodations. A higher proportion of students who received a diagnosis before medical school (88 students [53%]) requested Step 1 accommodations compared with those who received a diagnosis after medical school matriculation (30 students [25%]). Among the 97 students with known Step 1 accommodation approval status, 67 (69%) received accommodations. Step 1 accommodation approval rates were lowest for medical students with psychological disabilities (14 students [52%]) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (13 students [52%]) and those who received a diagnosis after matriculation (9 students [43%]). MSWD in schools with specialized DRP support had higher approval rates for Step 1 accommodation requests than MSWD in schools without specialized DRPs (49 students [78%] vs 18 students [53%]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of MSWDs, Asian MSWDs had lower USMLE Step 1 accommodation request rates. Students with psychological disabilities and those who received a diagnosis after matriculation had lower request and approval rates. The presence of specialized DRPs was associated with higher accommodation approval rate. Addressing disparities in USMLE Step 1 accommodations is critical for promoting equity and fostering a more representative health care workforce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.