Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41026486›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2025

Home-Delivered Nutrition Services for Older Adults Under the Older Americans Act.

Em Balkan, Emily A Gadbois, Emma L Tucher, Kimberly P Bernard, Kali S Thomas

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Em BalkanDepartment of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Emily A GadboisDepartment of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Emma L TucherKaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research, Pleasanton.
Kimberly P BernardCenter for Gerontology & Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Kali S ThomasCenter for Equity in Aging, Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The Older Americans Act Nutrition Program is essential to supporting older adults and their ability to maintain their quality of life. Despite this, such services are underfunded and are at risk of further cuts. Objective: To characterize the benefits of home-delivered meals programs as reported by older adult recipients. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study is a substudy within a randomized clinical trial, Deliver-EE, which evaluates the comparative effectiveness of 2 modes of meal delivery. Participants were randomized to 1 of 2 study groups: daily-delivered meals or frozen, bulk-shipped meals. Between August 2022 and March 2024, in-depth, semistructured telephone interviews with older adults receiving home-delivered meals were conducted. Interviews were conducted with participants living in California, Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Texas. The interview guide was designed in collaboration with 2 advisory panels. The guide covered the quality and impact of meals. Exposure: Receipt of home-delivered meals. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was to examine the benefits of home-delivered meals programs. Interview transcripts were analyzed using modified grounded theory and thematic analysis. Results: According to interviews with 54 participants (mean [SD] age, 75.9 [6.8] years; 30 female [55.6%]), home-delivered meals met the stated goals of the Older Americans Act Nutrition Program (to reduce hunger, food insecurity, and malnutrition; to promote socialization; and to promote the health and well-being of older adults). Participants said that home-delivered meals provided much-needed nutritional stability and that they had positive interactions with delivery drivers. Meals also relieved their stress, including by eliminating their need to cook for themselves, which can be physically taxing. In addition, participants said home-delivered meals improved the health, well-being, and finances of their caregivers. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this qualitative study of home-delivered nutrition services for older adults suggest that home-delivered meals programs achieved their intended outcomes and yielded meaningful benefits beyond their stated purpose that remain to be quantified. The findings also support funding the Older Americans Act Nutrition Program.

Indexed as

Food ServicesAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFood AssistanceHumansMaleMealsQualitative ResearchUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41026486
PMCPMC12485633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.