ArticleJournal of radiation research2025
Utilize in-vivo offline PET/CT imaging to evaluate range deviations of implanted metal-clips in whole-breast proton radiotherapy.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presented a quantitative analysis of the differences in the depths of the distal 50% of acquired and estimated positron emission tomography (PET) images for 18 patients who had a total of 109 titanium (Ti) metal-surgical clips implanted after breast-conserving surgery. Offline PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) images were acquired after proton irradiation. Hounsfield Unit modifications were applied to correct for metal artifacts induced by the Ti clips in the planning CT scans of the soft tissues surrounding the clips. The positron-emitting-isotope PET distribution was calculated through Range-Verification scripting. Quantitative analysis was conducted on the depth differences at the distal 50% R50 of the PET and the calculated PET distribution. Using the R50 method, the depth verification results of the clips and the normal tissues were compared. The R50 method calculates the positional difference at the half-maximum value 2 cm from the skin, with clips beyond this position not affecting the results. Analyses of the regions around the Ti clips were conducted. The depth difference for Ti < 2 cm (where the depth of the clips from the skin was <2 cm) was -1.63 ± 1.08 mm, while the corresponding normal tissue (Ticont) showed a depth difference of -1.79 ± 1.15 mm. There was no statistically significant difference in the depth differences between Ti < 2 cm and the corresponding Ticont. This study utilized offline PET verification to demonstrate that applying tissue corrections based on surgical clips and surrounding muscle tissues in clinical practice ensures that the presence of surgical clips does not compromise the precision of proton dose delivery at the surgical site.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.