ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2025
Sacituzumab govitecan and stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of HER2 negative breast cancer brain metastases: a multi-institutional report.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brain metastasis: Opportunities for novel therapies.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026Review
- Current and future therapies for triple-negative breast cancer.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Case Report: Interpectoral lymph node metastasis as an indicator of occult breast cancer: a case of double primary malignancy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeImproved treatment strategies are needed for HER2 negative breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM). Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is the standard of care for limited brain metastases. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) may have intracranial efficacy for BCBM; however, safety and efficacy data remain limited when combined with SRS.
methodsA multi-institutional retrospective review was performed of patients with HR+/HER2- and triple negative (TNBC) BCBM treated with SG and SRS for active BMs at three institutions. Concurrent SG and SRS was defined as SRS after the date of first SG infusion and before or on the date of last SG infusion. Safety was assessed as well as distant intracranial control (DIC), systemic and central nervous systemic (CNS) progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC), and overall survival (OS).
resultsA total of 277 lesions were treated over 36 SRS courses in 26 patients. Median follow up from SG initiation was 23.3 months. One hundred sixty-eight (61%) lesions were treated with single fraction SRS and 109 (39%) lesions were treated with fractionated SRS (fSRS). One hundred thirty-five (47%) lesions received concurrent SRS and SG. No cases of symptomatic radiation necrosis (SRN) were noted. LC rates at 12- and 24-months were 94% and 84%, respectively. Median CNS-PFS was 5.4 months (95% CI 2.8-7.3). Median systemic PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI 2.2-7.3 months). Median overall survival was 8.4 months with a 24-month rate of 16%.
conclusionIn our series, concurrent SRS and SG was associated with excellent local control, without an increased risk of SRN. Prospective investigation into potential synergy is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41026418What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.