ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2025
Implementing an Evidence-Informed Teaching Approach for Autistic Students in Bengaluru, India.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThere is a lack of evidence-informed teaching approaches for autistic students, particularly in culturally diverse, low-resource settings. This study implemented a manualized, evidence-informed teaching approach called Classroom Pivotal Response Teaching (CPRT) in an urban special education school in Bengaluru, India. CPRT provides teaching strategies that addresses student motivation, initiation, and generalization during implementation of learning goals. All students in the study had diagnoses of moderate to severe autism, and some also had intellectual disability.
methodsWe assessed the acceptability, feasibility, and implementation fidelity of CPRT using a mixed-methods approach. Eight special educators were trained in CPRT over ten weeks.
resultsAll eight educators were successfully trained to fidelity, and six of eight teachers maintained fidelity 1.5 to 4 months after training. Further, qualitative data indicated that CPRT was considered acceptable and beneficial, particularly to student engagement, skill acquisition, and speech, as well as teachers' self-efficacy. CPRT was feasible to educators in individual teaching settings and for high-priority learning goals, as opposed to group settings for all learning goals, due to time and resource constraints.
conclusionOverall, this study demonstrates the promise of CPRT in special education settings in India, suggesting the need for a larger-scale efficacy trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41026389What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.