ArticleEndocrine2025
To assess the patterns of use of ASA-statin free combinations in primary care: a population-based study in Italy.
Article in Endocrine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCardiovascular events like heart attacks and strokes can be effectively prevented by ASA (acetylsalicylic acid) and statins. Research indicates that ASA-statins-fixed combinations benefit both primary and secondary cardiovascular event prevention. The primary advantage is enhancing and maintaining medication adherence, a significant concern in cardiovascular disease treatment. We evaluated users of free ASA-statin combinations to quantify adherence levels and identify characteristics of adherent patients. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe formed a cohort of individuals 18 years or older active in a primary care database on December 31, 2022, and prescribed both ASA and statins that year.
resultsOf prevalent and incidence users of ASA-statin therapy, only 31 and 21% were properly adherent, respectively. Higher adherence rates were observed in males (11% more), those with cerebro/cardiovascular diseases (13% more), and patients taking 5 or more concurrent medications (45% more). Conversely, patients with gastrointestinal disorders, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, depression, or asthma/COPD showed significantly lower adherence. Most adherent patients (63-82%) used low-dose statins with ASA.
conclusionsThe findings suggest that adherence among patients using free-ASA-statin combinations is suboptimal. Given the importance of improving medication adherence, it is essential for primary care physicians to devise and implement strategies to enhance and sustain medication adherence, particularly for patients with specific characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41026388What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.