ArticleBotanical studies2025
Reproductive barriers in Serapias x kelleri.
Article in Botanical studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding the reproductive barriers in natural plant hybrids is fundamental for comprehending mechanisms of speciation and evolutionary divergence. Most studies focus on reproductive barriers and gene exchange material between parental species, whereas fewer emphasize the biological significance of hybrid viability and their ability to interbreed with each other or with the parental species. To address this gap, the present study focuses on the hybrid Serapias x kelleri and its parental species, Serapias vomeracea and Serapias cordigera to evaluate reproductive success and the role of prezygotic and postzygotic barriers. Specifically, the purpose of this study was to investigate and evaluate the reproductive success, the biological and evolutionary implications of Serapias x kelleri, in terms of fruit production and seeds produced through hand pollination of any possible bidirectional cross combinations between hybrid plants and both parental species.
resultsControlled manual crosses between hybrids and parental species to assess fruit and viable seed production were conducted. Results revealed no prezygotic barriers, as all pollinated flowers formed fruit. However, postzygotic barriers were evident, with significant variability in viable seed production. Hybrid self-crosses showed the lowest seed viability (0.6%), indicating strong postzygotic isolation and possible inbreeding depression. Crosses between hybrids and parental species exhibited a variable embryo production, with average values ranging from 5,6% to 29,1%. Remarkable is the fact that when the hybrid acts as a pollen donor, the percentage of viable seeds with embryos is higher, with average values ranging from 18.9% to 29.1%. Opposite, when the hybrid receives pollen from one of the parental species, the values of viable seeds decrease dramatically, with averages that do not exceed 10%. These data clearly show an asymmetric reproductive capacity of the hybrid, with significantly higher success when acting as the pollen parent compared to the maternal parent.
conclusionsThis study emphasizes the critical role of reproductive barriers in maintaining species integrity within the Serapias genus. Natural hybrids such as S. x kelleri can facilitate gene flow between parental species. However, strong postzygotic barriers significantly limit their fertility, thereby driving evolutionary divergence and preserving the genetic identity of each species. These barriers consequently reduce the likelihood of speciation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.