Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41026380›Full record

ArticleCarbon balance and management2025

Defining the relationship between bulk density and organic carbon content in forest soils using generalised linear mixed-effect models.

Aleš Kučera, Dušan Vavříček, Karel Drápela, Václav Zouhar, Michal Friedl, Valerie Vranová

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Carbon balance and management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aleš KučeraDepartment of Geology and Soil Science, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, 613 00, Czech Republic.
Dušan VavříčekDepartment of Geology and Soil Science, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, 613 00, Czech Republic.
Karel DrápelaDepartment of Forest Management and Applied Geoinformatics, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, 613 00, Czech Republic.
Václav ZouharDepartment of Geology and Soil Science, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, 613 00, Czech Republic.
Michal FriedlDepartment of Forest Botany, Dendrology and Geobiocoenology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, 613 00, Czech Republic.
Valerie VranováDepartment of Geology and Soil Science, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, 613 00, Czech Republic. valerie.vranova@mendelu.cz.

Funding

European Union's H2020 Research and Innovation Programme 952314Ministerstvo Zemědělství QK21010198Technology Agency of the Czech Republic SQ01010088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this study, we used a generalised linear mixed-effects model (GLMER) to establish a predictive pedotransfer function defining the relationship between forest soil bulk density and total organic carbon. More than 950 soil samples were obtained from four forested areas with a wide range of bedrock (limestone, loess, crystalline volcanic, sandstone, alluvial loam, polygenic loam and transported materials rich in organic carbon) and soil types (Leptosols, Cambisols, Fluvisols, Podzols and Technosols). Model validation was performed by testing against 10% of the data randomly selected from the original dataset (10% dataset) and an independent dataset from the Czech national forest inventory (NFI2 dataset).

resultThe GLMER including sample origin locality as random effect displayed a highly accurate predictive capacity. Subsequent analysis avoided model simplification by excluding sample origin and retaining the global GLMER only. For all samples, the final model covered a range from 0.16 to 27.70% for total organic carbon and from 0.27 to 1.94 g cm

conclusionThe pedotransfer functions produced, particularly that based on global GLMER, can be used to express bulk density via total organic carbon content, or vice versa, with high accuracy. While based on a wide range of bedrock/soil types, further studies may be needed in other regions to validate the model for general application.

Indexed as

Climate changePedotransfer functionSoil carbon stockSoil stoninessUndisturbed soil sample

Identifiers

PMID41026380
PMCPMC12486959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.