ArticleProgress in orthodontics2025
Prediction of bone recovery after iatrogenic dehiscences/fenestrations caused by lingual bonded retainers: a clinical report.
Article in Progress in orthodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The "periodontal ligament-periosteum (PDL-PS) sandwich hypothesis" has been proposed to explain the mechanism of bone recovery around roots moved outside their bony housing. This hypothesis suggests that the presence of the periosteum and periodontal ligament facilitates bone recovery in such cases. This retrospective case series examines three adult patients who developed iatrogenic dehiscences and fenestrations of the anterior teeth due to the placement of fixed lingual retainers after orthodontic treatment. Each patient then underwent orthodontic retreatment aimed at repositioning the roots back into the alveolar housing. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans and intraoral photographs taken before (T2) and after (T3) retreatment were used to evaluate bone recovery. To test the PDL-PS sandwich hypothesis, predictions of bone recovery were made based on T2 parameters and the root movements achieved during retreatment. The observed bony recovery at T3 was then compared with these predictions. Roots that were partially or fully repositioned into the original alveolar housing exhibited partial to complete bony recovery. In contrast, teeth with minimal root movement back into bone showed limited or no recovery. In cases with pre-existing gingival recession, bone recovery occurred only apical to the areas of recession, even with favorable root movements. Additionally, the dimensions of the alveolar housing remained stable as roots moved through the alveolar bone, supporting the theory that roots move through alveolar bone, rather than with bone, in adults. These findings highlight the need for evidence-based clinical strategies to guide the management of inadvertent tooth movement caused by orthodontic appliances or retainers, with particular attention to the potential for bone recovery when repositioning teeth into their original alveolar housing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.