ArticleVeterinary research communications2025
Short communication: Pharmacological semen collection in dogs via urethral catheterization: evaluation of cardiorespiratory stability and semen quality under continuous dexmedetomidine infusion.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pharmacological semen collection (PSC) via urethral catheterization employs α2-adrenergic agonists to induce semen emission. While dexmedetomidine is effective for PSC at doses of 15-20 µg/kg, doses above 3 µg/kg in dogs are associated with notable cardiorespiratory adverse effects. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a low-dose sedative protocol for PSC in domestic dogs. Ten male dogs were sedated with intramuscular dexmedetomidine (3 µg/kg) combined with ketamine (3 mg/kg). After 10 min, a continuous dexmedetomidine infusion (3 µg/kg/h) was initiated, and following 10 min of infusion, a propofol bolus (1-2 mg/kg) was administered to allow catheterization and semen collection. Heart rate, respiratory rate, and mean arterial pressure were continuously monitored. Semen samples were analyzed for macroscopic characteristics (color, volume, pH) and microscopic parameters (sperm morphology, plasma membrane integrity). Sperm concentration, and kinectics were assessed using a portable computer-assisted sperm analysis system. The protocol maintained stable cardiopulmonary parameters in all animals. Two dogs did not emit semen; however, the remaining eight yielded samples with a mean volume of 15.49 ± 2.98 µL and a sperm concentration of 693.69 ± 116.15 million spermatozoa/mL. Motility parameters included total motility (20.74 ± 5.17%), progressive motility (12.80 ± 4.32%), curvilinear velocity (51.79 ± 4.04 μm/s), and sperm linearity (22.00 ± 1.68%). The mean proportion of sperm with intact plasma membranes was 53.16 ± 2.52%. In conclusion, the proposed protocol was safe and moderately effective for PSC in dogs; however, the suboptimal semen quality underscores the need for further refinement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41026302What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.