ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Real-life data on treatment strategies for polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA) is one of the most difficult subgroups of JIA to manage. The aim of this study is to compare patients who were started on MTX at diagnosis and continued on monotherapy during follow-up with patients who later required the addition of bDMARDs. Patients with pJIA following up between January 2013 and December 2023 were included in the study. The juvenile arthritis disease activity score (JADAS) was used for disease activity, and the juvenile arthritis damage index (JADI) was used for damage status. The study included 78 pJIA patients, 56 (71.8%) of whom were girls. The median age at the time of pJIA diagnosis was 11.3 (IQR 6.6-14.3) years. The patients were divided into two groups: those receiving only methotrexate (MTX) (n = 23, 29.5%) and those receiving MTX and biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) (n = 55, 70.5%). The time elapsed until diagnosis, elbow involvement, duration of follow-up, and time to achieve clinically inactive disease were all significantly higher in patients receiving MTX + bDMARDs (p < 0.05). No significant difference was observed in the JADAS-71 value at diagnosis (p > 0.05). The JADAS-71 and JADI values at the 3rd, 6th, and 12th months were also significantly higher in patients receiving MTX and bDMARDs (p < 0.05).
conclusionsPatients with pJIA can achieve remission with conventional DMARDs alone, such as methotrexate. Patients with high JADAS-71 and JADI-Articular (JADI-A) values may require the use of bDMARDs. In particular, high JADAS-71 values detected at the 6th month can be used as a predictor for starting bDMARDs in pJIA patients. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Polyarticular JIA is a challenging subtype with heterogeneous treatment responses. • Objective tools such as JADAS-71 are widely used to assess disease activity and support treatment monitoring. WHAT IS NEW: • JADAS-71 serves as a valuable tool to guide the timing of biologic therapy initiation in pJIA patients. • Although the management of pJIA is challenging for clinicians, some patients may achieve remission with only MTX.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41026294What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.