Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41026292›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2025

You have no power here! Social status does not modulate observationally acquired binding and retrieval effects.

Kira Franke, Klaus Rothermund, Bernhard Hommel, Carina G Giesen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kira FrankeDepartment of Psychology, General Psychology II, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Am Steiger 3, Haus 1, 07743, Jena, Germany. kira.luisa.franke@uni-jena.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3038-2826
Klaus RothermundDepartment of Psychology, General Psychology II, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Am Steiger 3, Haus 1, 07743, Jena, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9350-5272
Bernhard HommelDepartment of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4731-5125
Carina G GiesenDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Health and Medical University, Erfurt, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2395-4435

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research shows that observationally acquired stimulus-response binding and retrieval (oSRBR) effects only occur when the observed person is socially relevant. An important factor that influences one's social relevance in everyday life is social status: People typically orient their behavior and attention towards others whom they perceive to be of higher social status than themselves. This implies that these persons are considered more relevant than other persons of lower status. Thus, in two experiments we tested whether social status modulates oSRBR effects. To manipulate social status, participants were either assigned to a high status or low status condition. High status participants were able to give their interaction partner feedback on their performance and decided how an extra reward would be split between them. Then they performed an online interactive color classification task to assess oSRBR effects. Contrary to our expectation and despite successful manipulation checks, we did not find a modulation of oSRBR by social status in two highly powered (total N = 329) experiments. We discuss the implications of our findings for research on the influence of social status on imitative action regulation processes.

Indexed as

Imitative BehaviorMental RecallSocial PerceptionSocial StatusAdolescentAdultAttentionFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultEvent filesObservational learningOnline interactionsSocial statusStimulus-response binding

Identifiers

PMID41026292
PMCPMC12484378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.