ArticleNeuroinformatics2025
Reducing Inter-Individual Differences in Task fMRI Preprocessing with OGRE (One-Step General Registration and Extraction) Preprocessing.
Article in Neuroinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dynamic functional reorganization in post-stroke aphasia: a state-of-the-art fMRI review from disease evolution to intervention.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Volumetric analysis methods continue to enjoy great popularity in the analysis of task-related functional MRI (fMRI) data. Among these methods, omnipresent throughout the field is the software tool FEAT, part of the FSL package (FMRIB, Oxford, UK). However, FEAT preprocessing involves multi-step interpolation (multiple sequential transformations), which at typical fMRI field strengths (i.e. 3T) has not been systematically compared with with alternative methods, in part due to lack of software tools compatible with FSL FEAT analysis. Here we developed the One-step General Registration and Extraction (OGRE) pipeline to combine FreeSurfer brain extraction, FSL FNIRT registration, one-step interpolation of preprocessing transformations, and output for FSL FEAT analysis. We compared OGRE with two alternative preprocessing methods (fMRIPrep and FSL) in a dataset wherein adult human volunteers (N = 53) performed a precision drawing task during fMRI scanning. OGRE preprocessing led to lower inter-subject variability than FSL (p = 7.3 × 10− 9) or fMRIPrep (p = 0.036); OGRE also led to the strongest detection of task-related magnitude in primary motor cortex contralateral to movement (OGRE > FSL p = 4.2 × 10− 4, other method pairs not significant). This pattern suggests that one-step interpolation (used by OGRE and fMRIPrep) reduces inter-individual variability during moderate-resolution (2 mm3) volumetric analysis of task fMRI data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.