ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2025
Development and validation of a machine learning model for early prediction of intensive care unit acquired weakness.
Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00512122 (Impact of Early Parenteral Nutrition Completing Enteral Nutrition in Adult Critically Ill Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of Early Parenteral Nutrition Completing Enteral Nutrition in Adult Critically Ill Patients
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable Machine Learning for In-Hospital Mortality Prediction in ICU Patients Using First-24-Hour Routine Vital Signs: A SHAP-Based MIMIC-IV Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Predicting ICU-Acquired Weakness in Postoperative Patients.Nursing in critical care · 2026Article
- ICU-Acquired Weakness: An Unsolved Clinical Problem: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Risk stratification and determinant identification of high-need, high-cost ICU patients using machine learning: a large-scale retrospective study from a multi-specialty ICU in a tertiary hospital.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Dynamic changes in quadriceps and diaphragm thickness for early diagnosis of ICU-acquired weakness in elderly ICU patients: a prospective bedside ultrasound study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Integrating sarcopenia into ICU-acquired weakness risk stratification: a machine learning-based prediction model for critical care.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Correction: Development and validation of a machine learning model for early prediction of intensive care unit acquired weakness.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly identification of potential high cost and high need patients on the ICU may assist in the development of targeted protocols, which allows proper resource utilization and initialization of preventive care. Weakness acquired in the ICU developed within the first week is an independent predictor of both short and long-term adverse outcomes, nonetheless early prediction is challenging. We aimed to develop and validate a machine learning model for ICU acquired-weakness (ICU-AW), using data readily available within the first 24 h of ICU admission.
methodsPatients from the EPaNIC trial (NCT00512122, N = 4640) who were assessed for muscle weakness at day 9 (IQR 8-13), after ICU-admission, using the Medical Research Council (MRC) sum. Patients are diagnosed with ICU-AW if their MRC is higher than 48. The final subset contains N = 600. Our models were internally validated using 100 repetitions of fivefold cross validation. We compared three predictive models: (i) a random forest and (ii) a logistic regression model built using descriptors available at day 1, (iii) a random forest using only APACHE II as a descriptor. Both random forests contain 150 trees.
resultsThe training set comprised 600 patients where the incidence of ICU-AW was 38.6% (232/600). The AUROC of the random forest with all descriptors and the logistic regression were 76% and 74%, respectively. The random forest (RF) achieved a specificity of 62% and a sensitivity 79%, whereas the logistic regression yielded 69% and 68%, respectively. The RF identified APACHE II, creatinine, SOFA PaO2/FiO2, bilirubin, BMI, age, glycemia upon admission, morning glycemia and sepsis as the most relevant descriptors. Lastly, the RF also presented very good calibration and clinical usefulness for a wide range of risk thresholds.
conclusionsMachine learning models, especially random forests, can be used to predict if patients are at risk of developing ICU-AW, using data available within 24 h of admission. This tool allows prognostication early in an adult general critically ill patient population, with the potential to detect high cost and high need patients who benefit from different levels of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.