Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41026286›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2025

Development and validation of a machine learning model for early prediction of intensive care unit acquired weakness.

Felipe Kenji Nakano, Nathalie Van Aerde, Grégoire Coppens, Ilse Vanhorebeek, Celine Vens, Greet Van den Berghe, Fabian Güiza Grandas

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00512122 (Impact of Early Parenteral Nutrition Completing Enteral Nutrition in Adult Critically Ill Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00512122 phase4active not recruitingnot on this map

Impact of Early Parenteral Nutrition Completing Enteral Nutrition in Adult Critically Ill Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorKU LeuvenRan2007 to 2026Enrolled4,640ConditionsCritical Illness, StarvationArmsWithholding PN during the first week of ICU stay, Oliclinomel N71000 OR N71000E // Clinimix N17G35 OR N17G35E
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Felipe Kenji Nakano *Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven KULAK, Etienne Sabbelaan 53, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium. felipekenji.nakano@kuleuven.be.
Nathalie Van Aerde *Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Clinical Division and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, KU Leuven, UZ, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.
Grégoire CoppensDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Clinical Division and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, KU Leuven, UZ, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.
Ilse VanhorebeekDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Clinical Division and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, KU Leuven, UZ, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.
Celine Vens *Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven KULAK, Etienne Sabbelaan 53, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium.
Greet Van den Berghe *Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Clinical Division and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, KU Leuven, UZ, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.
Fabian Güiza Grandas *Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Clinical Division and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, KU Leuven, UZ, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.

Funding

European Research Council Advanced Grants AdvG-2012-321670European Research Council Advanced Grants AdvG-2017-785809Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 1131618NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 1235924NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek G080118NVlaamse Overheid METH14/06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly identification of potential high cost and high need patients on the ICU may assist in the development of targeted protocols, which allows proper resource utilization and initialization of preventive care. Weakness acquired in the ICU developed within the first week is an independent predictor of both short and long-term adverse outcomes, nonetheless early prediction is challenging. We aimed to develop and validate a machine learning model for ICU acquired-weakness (ICU-AW), using data readily available within the first 24 h of ICU admission.

methodsPatients from the EPaNIC trial (NCT00512122, N = 4640) who were assessed for muscle weakness at day 9 (IQR 8-13), after ICU-admission, using the Medical Research Council (MRC) sum. Patients are diagnosed with ICU-AW if their MRC is higher than 48. The final subset contains N = 600. Our models were internally validated using 100 repetitions of fivefold cross validation. We compared three predictive models: (i) a random forest and (ii) a logistic regression model built using descriptors available at day 1, (iii) a random forest using only APACHE II as a descriptor. Both random forests contain 150 trees.

resultsThe training set comprised 600 patients where the incidence of ICU-AW was 38.6% (232/600). The AUROC of the random forest with all descriptors and the logistic regression were 76% and 74%, respectively. The random forest (RF) achieved a specificity of 62% and a sensitivity 79%, whereas the logistic regression yielded 69% and 68%, respectively. The RF identified APACHE II, creatinine, SOFA PaO2/FiO2, bilirubin, BMI, age, glycemia upon admission, morning glycemia and sepsis as the most relevant descriptors. Lastly, the RF also presented very good calibration and clinical usefulness for a wide range of risk thresholds.

conclusionsMachine learning models, especially random forests, can be used to predict if patients are at risk of developing ICU-AW, using data available within 24 h of admission. This tool allows prognostication early in an adult general critically ill patient population, with the potential to detect high cost and high need patients who benefit from different levels of care.

Indexed as

Critical illnessIntensive Care UnitMuscle weaknessRandom forestSupervised Machine Learning

Identifiers

PMID41026286
PMCPMC12484466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.