ArticleTropical animal health and production2025
Enzymatic additives and feed form influence on performance, intestinal absorption, bone composition, and propionic acid activity in the cecum of broilers at 42 days of age.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the inclusion of enzymatic additives in mash and pelleted feed on performance, carcass and cuts yield, intestinal health, and bone quality in broilers. A total of 1,320 one-day-old male Cobb 500® chicks (45.68 ± 0.5 g) were distributed in a completely randomized design in 2 × 3 factorial scheme. The first factor was diet form (mash or pelleted), and the second factor was feeding regime, consisting of three groups: positive control (PC), which consisted of chicks that received a basal diet based on corn and soybean meal; negative control (NC) and NC with enzymatic additive (NC-EA) were based on the same basal diet as the PC, but reduced by 100 kcal/kg of metabolizable energy and 15% of calcium and phosphorus. The NC-EA diet was supplemented with 200 g/kg of an enzymatic additive containing phytase (1,000 SPU/g) and xylanase (7,500 EPU/g). The experiment consisted of six treatments, with 10 replicates and 22 birds per experimental unit. Broilers fed a pelleted diet with NC-EA showed lower feed conversion and greater jejunal absorption area than those fed a mash diet at 42 days. Broilers fed a pelleted diet showed higher weight gain, greater wing and breast tenders, increased tibia ash and phosphorus, greater tibia breaking strength, and higher propionic acid levels compared to those fed mash diets, with or without enzymatic additive. It is concluded that NC-EA with pelleted diet supported broiler performance, and pelleting improved bone mineralization and propionic acid activity over mash diet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41026282What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.