Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41026258›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2025

Diverging roles of domain-specific anxieties in number-space associations. Insights from a multi-directional number line paradigm.

Sophie J Leonard, Flavia H Santos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sophie J LeonardSchool of Psychology, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Flavia H SantosSchool of Psychology, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. flavia.santos@ucd.ie.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapidly evolving scientific, technological and societal advancements depend on those who are accomplished in mathematics, so uncovering the underpinnings of maths performance remains a valuable topic of research. The interplay between numerical and spatial aspects of cognition is of interest in this respect, and interference in this relationship from domain-specific anxieties present potential long-term consequences for overall maths learning and achievement. This study examines the impacts of maths anxiety and spatial anxiety on visuo-spatial elements of mathematical performance i.e. number line estimation. Across three separate experiments, we examine how different variations of the number line estimation task (i.e. directionality, range and unbounding) tap into spatial aspects of numerical cognitive interaction with domain-specific anxieties. Secondarily, we explore the pertinent relationship between these emotional factors and gender. We implemented three adaptations of the multi-directional number line task to simultaneously assess elements of individual differences in spatial-numerical associations. The paradigm was administered online to 471 participants in the United Kingdom across three studies. Regression models indicated that while directional number line estimation was predicted by maths anxiety, no relationship was found for spatial anxiety in any of the three experiments. While no differences in gender were found in task performance, significant differences existed in both anxiety domains. We discuss results in the context of the solid, yet elusive relationships between numerical and spatial processing and the affective underpinnings of mathematics performance in adults.

Indexed as

AnxietyMathematical ConceptsMathematicsSpace PerceptionAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultMath anxietyNumerical cognitionSpatial anxietySpatial cognitionSpatial-numerical associations

Identifiers

PMID41026258
PMCPMC12484368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.