SynthesisSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2025
Electrocardiogram heart rate variability for machine learning diagnosis of obstructive sleep Apnoea: A bayesian meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnosing Obstructive Sleep Apnea Using Photoplethysmography: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Using Overnight Pulse Oximetry: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Awake speech recordings for machine learning diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea: a Bayesian meta-analysis.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025Pooled it
- SDANN May Be Used as a Screening Factor of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adult Individuals.BioMed research international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeObstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSA) is a common yet underdiagnosed condition associated with significant health risks. Although polysomnography is the diagnostic gold standard, it is resource-intensive and unsuitable for widespread screening. Heart rate variability (HRV) derived from electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings has emerged as a promising, accessible alternative for OSA detection. Recent developments in machine learning have enabled automated HRV analysis, potentially offering a scalable screening tool for OSA. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of machine learning-based models trained on HRV for detecting OSA in adults.
methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore (up to 20 October 2024) for eligible studies that assessed the accuracy of OSA diagnosis using AI models trained on HRV, compared to the apnoea-hypopnea index (AHI). Bayesian bivariate random-effects meta-analysis estimated pooled sensitivity and specificity. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2, and GRADE was used to rate evidence certainty.
resultsNine studies with 2,019 participants met inclusion criteria. Pooled sensitivity was 79.0% (95% CrI: 74.9%-82.7%) and specificity was 75.0% (95% CrI: 67.9%-82.3%). The diagnostic odds ratio was 11.3 (95% CrI: 7.21-19.0%). Meta-regression showed specificity varied with demographic factors, while model architecture and validation methods had no significant impact. No publication bias was detected.
conclusionsMachine learning models trained on HRV show good diagnostic accuracy for OSA, with higher specificity than STOP-BANG and comparable performance to home sleep tests. Their scalability and potential integration into wearable devices offer a practical, cost-effective screening option. Further real-world validation is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41026252What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.