SynthesisArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2025
A systematic review and meta-analysis of tension band plating vs. intramedullary nailing for anterior tibial diaphyseal stress fractures in athletes.
Synthesis in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReturn to sport (RTS) and optimal operative management for anterior tibial diaphyseal stress fractures (aTDSF) in athletes remain poorly defined.
methodsA systematic review was performed following PRISMA guidelines. Included studies examined aTDSF treated with IM nailing or tension band plating and reported time to RTS. Exclusions included non-English studies, abstracts, reviews, or those published before 1990, acute tibial fractures, or lacking operative management data. Extracted data included RTS rates, time to RTS, complications, demographics, and total aTDSF cases. A mixed method meta-analysis compared RTS times between treatment modalities.
resultsEight studies comprising 37 athletes met inclusion criteria. RTS was achieved in 100% (14/14) of IM nailing cases and 95% (19/20) of tension band plating cases. IM nailing had a mean RTS of 19.7 weeks, while tension band plating had a mean RTS of 11.4 weeks, showing a significant difference (p < 0.01). Subgroup analysis revealed negligible heterogeneity for tension band plating (I^2 = 0%) and moderate heterogeneity for IM nailing (I^2 = 66.7%). Complications for IM nailing included chronic anterior knee pain (2/14, 14%), while tension band plating complications included symptomatic hardware removal (6/20, 30%) and one athlete unable to compete (1/20, 5%). The included studies were small case series or case reports and thus prone to bias.
conclusionBoth IM nailing and tension band plating yield high RTS rates, but tension band plating may offer faster RTS, albeit with higher hardware-related complication rates. The moderate heterogeneity observed in the IM nailing subgroup, coupled with a moderate risk of bias across all included studies, underscores the need for further high-quality research to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41026237What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.