Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41026218›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2025

Difference thresholds in 3D space depend on perceived size, not depth.

Aviad Ozana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Aviad OzanaDepartment of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel. ozanaaviad1@g.ucla.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People typically perceive objects to be the same size and shape despite changes in viewing distance, a phenomenon known as object constancy. Recent work suggests that perceptual processing of object shape and size may be enhanced in near space, consistent with similar reports from attentional tasks. These studies, however, have some methodological limitations, as the viewing distance was manipulated using illusory 2D depth cues, for which perceptual processes may differ significantly from those in real three-dimensional (3D) environments. To address this, a series of psychophysical experiments were conducted in which participants' visual resolution for object length was tested within and outside their peripersonal space. In Experiments 1 and 2, difference thresholds (Just Noticeable Differences, JND) were measured using the Method of Adjustment, while Experiment 3 employed the Method of Constant Stimuli. Experiment 4 tested whether the findings can be extended to 3D stimuli. Results from Experiments 1 and 2 showed that perceived size (PSE) varied with distance. Critically, however, across all experiments, JNDs were modulated by the size of objects and were insensitive to differences in retinal size or viewing distance. These findings suggest that in natural 3D environments, perceptual resolution is constrained by high-level visual representations of object size. More broadly, the study points to potential differences in how perceptual mechanisms operate in 3D versus 2D contexts, consistent with recent findings in the perception and action literature.

Indexed as

Depth PerceptionSensory ThresholdsSize PerceptionSpace PerceptionAdultDistance PerceptionFemaleHumansMalePsychophysicsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41026218
PMCPMC12484268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.