ArticleMicrobial ecology2025
Aerobiology and Environmental Zonation in Gypsum Caves: A Comparative Study of Culturing and NGS Approaches.
Article in Microbial ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- PacBio HiFi sequencing datasets of culture-enriched airborne microbial cave communities from dolomitic Sudwala Caves, South Africa.Data in brief · 2026Article
- Habitat Specialization and Airborne Dispersal Shape the Microbiome of a Gypsum Karst Cave.Microbial ecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Classical aerobiological studies commonly use high-volume air samplers to quantify and identify cultivable airborne bacteria and fungi. However, this approach introduces a significant bias, as it overlooks the non-cultivable fraction, which likely constitutes a major component of the airborne microbiome. The advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has addressed this limitation, enabling a more comprehensive characterization of the cave aerobiome. This study analyzes both cultivable and non-cultivable airborne bacteria from Covadura and C3 caves, located in the Gypsum Karst of Sorbas (SE Spain). A total of 24 bacterial genera were identified using culture-based methods, whereas NGS revealed 749 genera. Culture-based methods using the surface air system (SAS) predominantly recovered Gram-positive spore-forming bacteria from the phyla Bacillota and Actinomycetota, which were largely absent or present in low relative abundances in the NGS datasets. In contrast, NGS revealed a broader diversity, including numerous Gram-negative and rare airborne bacteria not detected by culture. The NGS results from airborne samples showed greater similarity to the microbial communities found in cave biofilms and sediments, suggesting that a portion of airborne bacteria originates from within the cave and is influenced by microclimatic conditions such as ventilation and air stagnation. Although the short-read sequencing approach used in this study has limitations, such as reduced taxonomic resolution compared to the culture-based approach, it remains the most effective tool for capturing the diversity and ecological patterns of airborne microorganisms. The integration of gas tracers and other environmental data allowed the identification of zones within the cave with different ventilation patterns and degrees of isolation, which corresponded to different spatial distributions of airborne bacteria. Our findings underscore that reliable aerobiological studies in caves require the combination of non-culture dependent-based sequencing approaches and environmental monitoring to fully understand the origin, diversity, and ecological dynamics of airborne microbial communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.