Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41026209›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2025

Bacteria from the Amphibian Skin Inhibit the Growth of Phytopathogenic Fungi and Control Postharvest Rots.

Adriana J Gutiérrez-Pavón, Martina María Pereyra, Florencia Isabel Chacón, Elizabeth Monroy-Morales, Eria A Rebollar, Julián Rafael Dib, Mario Serrano, Yordan J Romero-Contreras

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Adriana J Gutiérrez-PavónCentro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México.
Martina María PereyraPlanta Piloto de Procesos Industriales Microbiológicos (PROIMI), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Tucumán, Argentina.
Florencia Isabel ChacónPlanta Piloto de Procesos Industriales Microbiológicos (PROIMI), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Tucumán, Argentina.
Elizabeth Monroy-MoralesCentro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México.
Eria A RebollarCentro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México.
Julián Rafael DibPlanta Piloto de Procesos Industriales Microbiológicos (PROIMI), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Tucumán, Argentina.
Mario SerranoCentro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México. serrano@ccg.unam.mx.
Yordan J Romero-ContrerasCentro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México. jhroco@ccg.unam.mx.

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica PICT-2021-GRF-TII-0020Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica N203023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postharvest diseases caused by phytopathogenic fungi represent one of the main challenges in the agricultural industry, leading to significant losses in fruit production. Although chemical treatments have been widely used for the control of these pathogens, the emergence of resistant strains and concerns regarding food safety and environmental impact have driven the search for novel effective and eco-friendly alternatives, such as the use of biological control agents (BCAs). Previously, we demonstrated that bacteria isolated from frog skin inhibit the growth of the phytopathogenic fungus Botrytis cinerea. Based on these findings, in this study we aimed to investigate the biocontrol potential of three bacterial isolates obtained from the skin of the frog Craugastor fitzingeri. Dual culture assays showed that these bacteria strongly inhibited the mycelial growth of several postharvest fungal phytopathogens, including Penicillium digitatum, P. italicum, Alternaria alternata, Aspergillus niger, and Alternaria solani. This antagonistic activity was further confirmed through assays using bacterial filtrates (BFs) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), effectively delaying or suppressing fungal development under in vitro conditions. Additionally, in vivo experiments on citrus fruits, tomato, and blueberry demonstrated that treatments with bacterial cell suspensions or BFs significantly reduced disease incidence caused by P. digitatum, A. alternata, and B. cinerea. However, no inhibitory effects were observed against Geotrichum citri-aurantii, Fusarium sp., Fusarium oxysporum, and Phytophthora capsici, suggesting a degree of specificity. Our findings highlight the potential of frog skin-associated bacteria as a novel source of BCAs for the sustainable management of postharvest diseases in fruits.

Indexed as

AntibiosisAnuraBacteriaBiological Control AgentsFungiPlant DiseasesSkinAlternariaAnimalsAspergillus nigerBotrytisCitrusFruitPenicilliumPest Control, BiologicalSolanum lycopersicumBiological Control AgentsVolatile Organic CompoundsBiological control agentsFruitsPhytopathogenic fungiPostharvest diseases

Identifiers

PMID41026209
PMCPMC12484273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.