Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41026199›Full record

ReviewUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Resource-efficient use of single-use surgical textiles : A data-driven analysis of 213,000 surgeries from 2022].

Moritz Goeldner

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Moritz GoeldnerTechnische Universität Hamburg, Am Schwarzenberg-Campus 4, 21073, Hamburg, Deutschland. moritz.goeldner@tuhh.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Operating rooms are among the most resource-intensive areas of hospitals and generate significant amounts of waste and carbon emissions. Single-use surgical textiles contribute significantly to the ecological footprint of surgical procedures. As a surgical discipline, urology makes a significant contribution to the volume of surgical procedures. The goal of this study was to quantify the contribution of surgical textiles to overall resource consumption and to analyze the extent to which ecological and economic savings can be achieved through standardized use. The study used data on surgeries and consumption of surgical textiles from 25 hospitals (in four tier levels) that belong to a privately owned hospital chain operating throughout Germany. Actual consumption of surgical textiles in 2022 was compared against a target scenario based on predefined surgical standards. For each surgical standard, carbon emissions were calculated using a life cycle assessment and was then allocated to the respective surgeries. In 2022, 213,048 surgeries were performed in the 25 hospitals. A total of 352.7 tons of single-use surgical textiles were used, which corresponds to 1997 tons of CO

Indexed as

Operating RoomsSurgical AttireTextilesUrologic Surgical ProceduresCarbon FootprintGermanyHumansLife cycle assessmentRaw materialsResource consumptionStandardizationSustainability

Identifiers

PMID41026199
PMCPMC12575565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.