SynthesisArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025
Investigating the clinical manifestations associated with isthmocele: a meta-analysis study.
Synthesis in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIsthmocele is recognized as a potential complication following cesarean delivery. Women affected by isthmocele experience an increased risk of various complications throughout their lives. The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical manifestations associated with isthmocele. MATERIALS AND
methodsA systematic search was conducted across Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies potentially eligible for inclusion as of November 6, 2024. All observational studies that evaluated the clinical symptoms associated with isthmocele were considered for this systematic review. The outcomes of interest included abnormal bleeding (hypermenorrhea, polymenorrhagia, amenorrhea, and spotting), dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, vaginal discharge, and urinary incontinence. Data extraction and statistical analyses were performed using EndNote X9 and Review Manager software, respectively. The NIH Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Studies was utilized to assess the quality of the included studies.
resultsOut of 5,530 studies reviewed, eight studies met the criteria for inclusion in this review. A total of 703 women with isthmocele were compared to 754 women without isthmocele regarding clinical symptoms. The findings indicated that isthmocele was positively correlated with the incidence of vaginal spotting (odds ratio (OR) = 2.39, 95% CI 1.79, 3.19; I
conclusionThe results of this study demonstrate a positive correlation between isthmocele and the incidence of amenorrhea and vaginal spotting. A comprehensive understanding of the clinical manifestations associated with isthmocele could contribute to improved care for women affected by this condition. PROSPERO ID: CRD42024619952.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.