ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2026
Pyometra-An Atypical Complication Following LeFort Colpocleisis: Narrative Review.
Review in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLeFort colpocleisis is a surgical alternative for women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Complications are rare and typically minor. The accumulation of purulence within the uterine cavity, or pyometra, after this procedure is exceptionally uncommon. To date, only a handful of cases have been reported. Hereby, we present a narrative review on the current knowledge regarding the diagnosis and treatment of this atypical complication.
methodsA literature search was conducted using five different databases to identify previously published articles on this subject. Relevant keywords included colpocleisis, LeFort colpocleisis, pyometra, and reoperation. Studies describing complications after colpocleisis with concurrent hysterectomy or colpocleisis of vaginal vault were excluded.
resultsSix case reports were identified, all from English-language sources. Data form an additional case at our institution was included. Median age was 78 years, and most women had multiple comorbidities. All underwent LeFort colpocleisis, with varying additional procedures. Only one case had a successful conservative approach; hysterectomy via laparotomy was ultimately required in the remaining cases. No cases of underlying malignancy were reported.
conclusionsPyometra is a rare but important differential diagnosis in patients with a history of LeFort colpocleisis presenting with fever, vaginal discharge, and abdominopelvic pain. A high index of clinical suspicion is paramount, since prompt diagnosis and appropriate surgical management are a standard of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.