Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41026037›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2025

Glenosphere Tilt and Size Predict Shoulder Kinematics During the Hand-to-Back Motion After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Ajinkya A Rai, Clarissa M LeVasseur, Gillian E Kane, Maria A Munsch, Christopher J Como, Alexandra S Gabrielli, Jonathan D Hughes, William J Anderst, Albert Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ajinkya A RaiBiodynamics Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-1096-1222
Clarissa M LeVasseurBiodynamics Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0001-7552-1765
Gillian E KaneBiodynamics Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Maria A MunschBiodynamics Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Christopher J ComoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Alexandra S GabrielliDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Jonathan D HughesDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
William J AnderstBiodynamics Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-0535-0953
Albert LinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0003-4204-3482

Funding

Effects of prosthesis design and placement on shoulder kinematics and strength after reverse shoulder arthroplastyR03AG064417 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ANDERST, WILLIAM J., LIN, ALBERT · 2019 to 2020
$157k
National Institute on Aging. R03AG064417.NIA NIH HHS R03 AG064417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Internal rotation (IR) is not reliably improved after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). This study aimed to identify surgical parameters that predict kinematics of the hand-to-back motion (H2B) after RSA and to identify associations between kinematics and clinical outcomes after RSA. We hypothesized that less humeral retroversion, more lateralization and a larger glenosphere would predict kinematics associated with favorable outcomes post-RSA. Thirty-five patients performed H2B while synchronized biplane radiographs were collected. Digitally reconstructed radiographs, constructed from patient-specific bone plus implant models, were matched to the biplane radiographs to determine kinematics. The total contribution to motion, the end position, peak angles, and range of motion (ROM) were found for all glenohumeral and scapular rotations. The path of the center of the humeral insert on the glenosphere was calculated. Patient-reported outcomes, clinical ROM, and strength were measured. Associations were determined between intraoperative variables and kinematics as well as between kinematics and outcomes. The results demonstrated that glenosphere tilt predicted glenohumeral and scapular kinematics; these kinematics were associated with IR ROM, strength, and more favorable patient-reported outcomes. A larger glenosphere predicted a center of contact that was associated with more strength in IR. All components of scapular rotation were associated with favorable outcomes, suggesting rehabilitation focusing on scapular motion may improve outcomes post-RSA. Glenosphere tilt and size predicted kinematics that were associated with range of motion, strength, and patient-reported outcomes.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, ShoulderShoulder JointShoulder ProsthesisAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRange of Motion, Articulararthroplastykinematicsoutcomesreverseshoulder

Identifiers

PMID41026037
PMCPMC12604453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.