ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2025
Can Hounsfield Unit Evaluation of Preoperative CT Scans Predict Surgeon's Preference of Cementless Fixation in Total Knee Arthroplasty?
Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cementless versus cemented fixation in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Knee-specific bone quality assessment for cementless total knee arthroplasty candidate selection: a narrative review.Knee surgery & related research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adequate bone quality is necessary for reliable cementless fixation during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Hounsfield Units (HUs) can be a useful surrogate of bone density, and therefore a proxy of bone quality. We sought to determine whether HU would correlate with subjective intraoperative assessment of bone quality and hence use of cementless fixation. A retrospective review of patients who underwent a robotic-assisted TKA between June 2022 and June 2024 by a single surgeon was conducted. HU measurements were obtained at three regions of interest (ROI) within the tibial plateau on preoperative axial-CT scans. Patients were divided into cementless or cemented tibial implant fixation groups based upon subjective intraoperative bone quality assessment. Demographic data such as age, sex, and BMI were collected. The final cohort included 630 patients. Cementless fixation was used in 58.3% of cases. Cementless patients had a higher combined overall average HU measurement (152.7 vs. 105.6, p < 0.001). Point-biserial correlation showed moderate inverse correlations between implant fixation type and HU measurements (all p < 0.001). ROC analysis and predictive modeling found that the best performance was derived from the combined model followed by combined demographics alone, and then HU measurements alone (AUC: 0.853 vs. 0.808 vs. 0.757). Standalone demographic resulted in the poorer predictive modeling. Ultimately, cementless fixation was associated with higher HU measurements compared to cemented fixation in all 3 ROI. HU in conjunction with combined demographic data offered the greatest confidence in predicting fixation type and therefore may be utilized to aid in decision-making and surgical planning for TKA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.