Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41025998›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2026

Ileal bile acid transporter inhibitors in Alagille syndrome and Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis: A systematic review into dose-response.

Alise D E de Groot, Cristina Chiadò, Jos G W Kosterink, Willem S Lexmond, Paola Mian, Henkjan J Verkade

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Dysbiosis in the Gut-Liver Axis Is Associated With Low Bone Mass During Murine Cholestasis.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alise D E de GrootDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6440-703X
Cristina ChiadòDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jos G W KosterinkDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Willem S LexmondDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Paola MianDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3551-1201
Henkjan J VerkadeDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ileal bile acid transporter inhibitors (IBATi), including maralixibat and odevixibat, are a novel approach to the treatment of paediatric cholestatic liver diseases, such as Alagille syndrome (ALGS) and different forms of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC). Multiple phase 3 trials have demonstrated efficacy of IBATi in alleviating pruritus and decreasing serum bile acid (sBA) in a significant subset of patients. While most clinical IBATi trials included low-dose and high-dose treatment, a consistent dose-response effect has not been uniformly reported. This systematic review aims to assess the dose-response relationship for IBATi in patients with ALGS or PFIC, based on available pruritus, sBA and (non-)responder outcomes, identifying minimally effective dosage and exploring the potential for personalized dosing strategies. A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library of articles, oral presentations, posters presentations and abstracts up to 29 July 2024. The analysis included 75 records, of which 68 reported sBA and 63 reported pruritus outcomes. An evident dose-response relationship was not observed for either maralixibat or odevixibat in PFIC or ALGS. In the case of odevixibat, outcomes measures for patients with ALGS have only been reported for a dosage of 120 μg/kg/day. In conclusion, the variability in therapeutic outcomes of different doses for all IBATi underscores the necessity for personalization of dosing, which may include decreasing the dosage for responders to IBATi.

Indexed as

Alagille SyndromeCholestasis, IntrahepaticBile Acids and SaltsCarrier ProteinsDioxolanesDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansIleumMembrane GlycoproteinsMethylaminesPruritusThiazepinesTreatment Outcome3-((((3R,5R)-3-butyl-3-ethyl-7-(methyloxy)-1,1-dioxido-5-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1,4-benzothiazepin-8-yl)methyl)amino)pentanedioic acidbile acid binding proteinsBile Acids and SaltsCarrier ProteinsDioxolanesMembrane GlycoproteinsMethylaminesThiazepinesAlagille syndromedose–response relationshipgenetic cholestatic diseasesileal bile acid transporter inhibitorspaediatricprogressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis

Identifiers

PMID41025998
PMCPMC12746362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.