Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41025938›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2026

Changes in Key Biodiversity Area networks following national comprehensive assessments.

Andrew J Plumptre, Zoltan Waliczky, Daniele Baisero, Olivia Crowe, Jeannot Kivono, Cecilia Tobar, Maria Gabriela Toscano, Natalia Boulad, Hugo Costa, Camila Davila and 37 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Extent, characteristics and policy applications of Key Biodiversity Areas.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Changes in Key Biodiversity Area networks following national comprehensive assessments.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

47 authors.

Andrew J PlumptreKBA Secretariat, c/o BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9333-4047
Zoltan WaliczkyBirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
Daniele BaiseroKBA Secretariat, c/o BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
Olivia CroweBirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
Jeannot KivonoKBA Secretariat, c/o BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
Cecilia TobarBirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
Maria Gabriela ToscanoBirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
Natalia BouladIUCN Regional Office for West Asia, Amman, Jordan.
Hugo CostaWildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, New York, USA.
Camila DavilaECOAN, Cusco, Peru.
Sophie DirouWildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, New York, USA.
Eleuterio DuarteWildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, New York, USA.
Karolina FierroInstituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, Colombia.
Carolina Castellanos-CastroInstituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, Colombia.
Hanna HaddadIUCN Regional Office for West Asia, Amman, Jordan.
Stephen HolnessCentre for African Conservation Ecology & Institute for Coastal and Marine Research, Nelson Mandela University, Gqeberha, South Africa.
Fiona MaiselsWildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0778-0615
Daniel MarnewickIUCN Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Office, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Menard MbendeWWF, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Goma, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Maitha Abdulla Al MheiriMinistry of Climate Change and Environment, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Dissondet MoundzohoWildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, New York, USA.
Simon NampindoWildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, New York, USA.
Grace NangendoWildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, New York, USA.
Steeve NgamaMissouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Catherine NumaIUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation, Campanillas, Spain.
Diego PeñarandaAsociación Armonía, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia.ORCID 0000-0003-3309-2880
Samridhi RijalKBA Secretariat, c/o BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
Manuel Sánchez-NivicelaFundación de Conservación Jocotoco, Quito, Ecuador.
Andrew SkownoSouth African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, South Africa.
Thomas StarnesIUCN, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6190-6098
Nicolas TexierMissouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Lize von StadenSouth African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-2652-7180
Anne BowserNatureServe, Arlington, Virginia, USA.
Thomas M BrooksIUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
Gill BuntingBirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
Stuart H M ButchartBirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
Neil CoxConservation International, Washington, DC, USA.
Wendy ElliotWWF International, Nairobi, Kenya.
Jo GilbertRoyal Society for the Protection of Birds, Sandy, UK.
Penny LanghammerRe:Wild, Austin, Texas, USA.
Olivier LangrandCritical Ecosystem, Partnership Fund, Washington, DC, USA.
Rachel NeugartenWildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, New York, USA.
Madhu RaoWorld Commission on Protected Areas, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
Jon Paul RodriguezIUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland, Switzerland.
Gina Della TognaAmphibian Survival Alliance, Austin, Texas, USA.
Amy UpgrenAmerican Bird Conservancy, Washington, DC, USA.
Stephen WoodleyWorld Commission on Protected Areas, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.

Funding

Bezos Earth FundDirectorate-General for International Partnerships, European UnionMinistry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab EmiratesSouth Africa National Biodiversity InstituteUSAID MozambiqueUSAID UgandaWWF International
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) are sites of significance for the global persistence of biodiversity. Based on the Global Standard for the Identification of Key Biodiversity Areas (KBA Standard), published in 2016, sites are currently being assessed for KBA designation in a growing number of countries across the world. For these assessments, the KBA criteria are applied to all species and ecosystems with available data. We reviewed the first comprehensive assessments of 11 countries and compared the KBA network before and after assessments. The mean (SD) number of KBAs per country increased by 69.6% (102.1), and the mean total extent of KBAs per country increased by 164.2% (150.7). More than half of the KBAs in 2024 had >50% of their area outside the 2019 KBAs, indicating a substantial increase in KBA extent (54.0% [18.8] of KBAs). The mean proportion of each KBA covered by protected or conserved areas decreased from 56.2% (20.2) to 44.5% (15.5), owing to the incorporation of unprotected sites in the KBA network. On average, 41.1% (14.0) of sites in each country (mean 44.5 [46.4] sites per country) and 47.2% (20.5) of new KBA area after the assessment were completely unprotected, indicating that many of the new sites were not recognized in national protected area networks as significant for biodiversity before the assessment. Making a comprehensive assessment of KBAs increased the combined coverage of protected and conserved area networks from 25.4% (10.6) to 32.0% (13.1) in each country and thus contributed to reducing biodiversity loss. Therefore, comprehensive assessments of KBAs led to a substantially increased number and extent of recognized sites of importance for biodiversity published in the World Database of KBAs. Where such assessments have not been made, many important areas for biodiversity may be overlooked. We therefore encourage other nations to update their KBA networks to inform efforts to meet the goals and targets of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.

Indexed as

BiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesÁrea Clave para la Biodiversidadbiodiversity assessmentconservation planningConvenio sobre la Diversidad BiológicaConvention on Biological Diversityevaluación de la biodiversidadKey Biodiversity AreaKunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity FrameworkMarco Mundial de Biodiversidad Kunming‐Montrealplaneación de la conservación保护规划关键生物多样性区域(KBA)《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》《生物多样性公约》生物多样性评估

Identifiers

PMID41025938
PMCPMC12856777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.