Observational studyJournal of rehabilitation medicine2025
Development of the Italian version of the modified Barthel index and preliminary reliability in adults with stroke.
Observational study in Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to develop the Italian version of the modified Barthel Index and assess its reliability within stroke survivors.
designSingle-centre, prospective observational study for measure validation. SUBJECTS/PATIENTS: To pre-test the pre-final scale, stroke survivors, caregivers, and health professionals were enrolled. For reliability, only stroke survivors were enrolled. Inclusion of stroke survivors: adults presenting ADL limitation; exclusion: severe visual/hearing impairment, Mini-Mental State Examination <21; severe language disorder, clinical instability.
methodsThe Italian modified Barthel Index was developed through forward-and-back translation, and interdisciplinary review. Clarity was evaluated by a sample of all participants. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by 2 independent physiotherapists, and test-retest examined 1-3 days later. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Spearman's correlation, quadratic weighted Kappa, and agreement percentages were calculated.
resultsClarity was evaluated with 30 participants (10 per group); minor semantic adjustments were made. Reliability was assessed within 51 stroke survivors, showing Spearman's correlation of 0.990 (test-retest) and 0.985 (inter-rater). ICCs were 0.990 and 0.987, respectively. Weighted Kappa values ranged from 0.76 to 0.98.
conclusionThe Italian Modified Barthel Index showed high reliability, supporting its use in Italian-speaking stroke populations. The validation of its other psychometric properties needs further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.