ArticleThe New phytologist2025
Bacterial fitness for plant colonization is influenced by plant growth substrate.
Article in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- From genotype to microbiome function: a gene-metabolite-microbiome pathway shaping plant nutrient acquisition.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- TheApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Extensive spontaneous genome reduction in Paraburkholderia sabiae.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial soil (ArtSoil): Recreating soil conditions in synthetic plant growth media.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026Article
- Unraveling fitness landscapes in plant-associated Bacteroidota.ISME communications · 2026Article
- Fit for purpose: evaluation and evolution of agricultural bioinoculants across production landscapes.ISME communications · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite advances in our understanding of bacterial plant colonization, the extent to which growth substrate influences the molecular mechanisms enabling bacteria to efficiently colonize plants remains poorly understood. To address this, we used randomly barcoded transposon mutagenesis sequencing (RB-TnSeq) in Paraburkholderia graminis OAS925, an efficient rhizosphere colonizer, and Brachypodium distachyon grown in six different substrates. Of the 382 rhizosphere colonization genes that we identified in OAS925, 348 genes (91.1%) are dependent on the growth substrate evaluated, and 34 genes (8.9%) are shared across all the substrates. Both the core and substrate-dependent colonization genes are from multiple functional categories, demonstrating the multifaceted and major impact that plant growth substrate has on bacterial colonization. The identified colonization genes and their varied importance across plant growth substrates could not be readily explained by differences in root exudate profiles, suggesting that the substrate environment itself plays an outsized role in the ability of a bacterium to colonize the rhizosphere. Our data confirm that bacterial fitness for plant colonization is strongly influenced by plant growth substrate type and highlights the importance of taking this parameter into consideration when engineering bacterial strains for improved host colonization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.