ArticlePharmacotherapy2026
Nephrocast-V: A Deep Learning Model for the Prediction of Vancomycin Trough Concentration Using Electronic Health Record Data.
Article in Pharmacotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning-Augmented Precision Dosing: Integrating Pharmacokinetic Modeling With Clinical Decision Support.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Review
- Narrow Therapeutic Index Drugs: Regulatory Frameworks, Bioequivalence, and Model-Informed Precision Dosing.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a machine learning model for individualised meropenem dosing in CRRT patients.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Nephrocast-V: A Deep Learning Model for the Prediction of Vancomycin Trough Concentration Using Electronic Health Record Data.Pharmacotherapy · 2026Article
- From time-series deep learning to physics-constrained population pharmacokinetics: AI-driven prediction of drug concentrations and exposure for model-informed dosing.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionVancomycin is a critical antibiotic for treating methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and other gram-positive bacterial infections, but achieving and maintaining therapeutic trough concentrations is challenging.
objectivesWe hypothesized that a deep learning model could accurately predict vancomycin trough concentrations 2 days in advance in critically ill patients and provide recommendations for optimal dosing adjustments to achieve target drug concentrations.
methodsWe trained and validated the model using electronic health record (EHR) data from adults admitted to the University of California San Diego Health system intensive care units (ICUs) from January 1, 2016, to June 30, 2024. Features included patient demographics, comorbidities, vital signs, laboratory measurements, medications, and vancomycin dosing information. The model architecture combined Long Short-Term Memory and Multi-Head Attention layers, supplemented with skip connections to incorporate past dosage information at the final layer of the deep learning model. Model performance was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE) metrics.
resultsA total of 2205 encounters met the eligibility criteria. The median age was 57 years, and the median ICU length of stay was 4.9 days. The model achieved an MAE of 3.15 mg/L and an RMSE of 4.17 mg/L, comparable to that of a critical care pharmacist aided by a Bayesian dosing software. Additionally, deviations from patient-specific model-based dose recommendations were generally associated with nontherapeutic vancomycin levels.
conclusionThis study demonstrates the potential to leverage deep learning to individualize and support vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring in critically ill patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.