Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41025606›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of surgery2025

Perioperative changes in the microbiome during rectal cancer surgery: exploratory analysis of the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) IntAct trial.

Jack A Helliwell, Caroline H Chilton, Caroline Young, Emma V Clark, Lyndsay Wilkinson, Alba Fuentes Balaguer, Daniel Bottomley, Julie Croft, Neil Corrigan, Andrew Kirby and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jack A HelliwellLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3579-0183
Caroline H ChiltonLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Caroline YoungDepartment of Histopathology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Emma V ClarkLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Lyndsay WilkinsonLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Alba Fuentes BalaguerLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Daniel BottomleyLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Julie CroftLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Neil CorriganLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Andrew KirbyLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Philip QuirkeLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3597-5444
Deborah D StockenLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
David G JayneLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8725-3283
Henry M WoodLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3009-5904

Funding

Cancer Research UKJean Shanks Foundation JSPS CLSG 2020 10 03Jean Shanks Foundation NIHR205280Jean Shanks Foundation NIHR213331Jean Shanks Foundation NIHR302439National Institute for Health and Care Research 14/150/62National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR303267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe gut microbiome may influence postoperative outcomes after rectal cancer surgery, including anastomotic leak. However, perioperative microbiome dynamics and their association with outcomes remain poorly understood. The aim of this study was to characterize changes in the rectal microbiome in patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery within the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) IntAct trial.

methodsRectal swabs were collected at baseline, day of surgery, and postoperative day 3-5. DNA was extracted for 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequencing and collagenase-producing organisms were identified by culture. Associations between microbiome composition and clinical variables were analysed.

resultsA total of 202 patients were included (mean age 65 years; 69.8% male). At baseline, smoking status explained 3.2% of variation in beta-diversity (P = 0.046). On the day of surgery, beta-diversity was associated with hospital site (11.1%; P = 0.033), mechanical bowel preparation (2.6%; P = 0.024), and preoperative oral antibiotics (1.0%; P = 0.020). After surgery, hospital site (16.3%; P < 0.001), a defunctioning stoma (2.9%; P = 0.003), and preoperative oral antibiotics (1.6%; P = 0.006) influenced beta-diversity. Alpha-diversity decreased over time, with postoperative increases in Enterococcus and Prevotella. A defunctioning stoma was associated with lower alpha-diversity and increased Pseudomonas and Streptococcus. No significant difference in alpha- or beta-diversity was observed between patients with and without anastomotic leak, although subtle differences in taxa of low abundance were detected and 43.6% of postoperative samples demonstrated collagenase activity.

conclusionThis is the largest study to date describing perioperative microbiome changes in patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery. Measurable shifts in the microbiome were observed, with small differences between patients with and without anastomotic leak. Further research is needed to explore the clinical significance of these microbiome changes.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeRectal NeoplasmsRectumAgedAnastomotic LeakFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerioperative PeriodPostoperative Complications

Identifiers

PMID41025606
PMCPMC12481238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.