Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41025529›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2025

Beyond QSARs: Quantitative Knowledge-Activity Relationships (QKARs) for enhanced drug toxicity prediction.

Ting Li, Yanyan Qu, Alexander Chen, Shraddha Thakkar, Dongying Li, Weida Tong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ting LiNational Center for Toxicological Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR 72079, United States.
Yanyan QuNational Center for Toxicological Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR 72079, United States.
Alexander ChenNational Center for Toxicological Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR 72079, United States.
Shraddha ThakkarOffice of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20903, United States.
Dongying LiNational Center for Toxicological Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR 72079, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0721-2500
Weida TongNational Center for Toxicological Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR 72079, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3488-6148

Funding

US Food and Drug Administration
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational toxicology plays an important role in risk assessment and drug safety. The field has been traditionally dominated by Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSARs), which predict toxicological effects based solely on chemical structure. Although QSARs have achieved successes, their structure reliance limits drug toxicity predictions, where small structural modifications may cause major toxicity changes. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI), especially text embedding and generative AI, provide an opportunity to enhance toxicity predictions by leveraging broader chemical knowledge and its integration with structural data. In this study, we propose a novel framework, Quantitative Knowledge-Activity Relationships (QKARs), which predicts toxicity using domain-specific knowledge. We developed QKAR models for two drug toxicity endpoints, drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and drug-induced cardiotoxicity (DICT), using three different knowledge representations with varying levels of knowledge. The representations based on comprehensive knowledge of the drugs yielded better prediction than those with simpler knowledge. Five machine learning algorithms of distinct complexity were applied in QKAR models, and we observed little association between model complexity and performance. Further, we evaluated QKARs against QSARs on the same endpoints using identical datasets. We found that QKARs consistently outperformed QSARs for DILI and DICT. Notably, QKARs demonstrated better capability than QSARs in differentiating drugs with similar structures but different liver toxicity profiles. We also investigated integrating knowledge-based and structure-based representations, Q(K + S)ARs, for further enhanced prediction accuracy. Our findings demonstrate the potential of QKARs as a robust alternative to QSARs, offering additional opportunities in drug toxicity assessments by leveraging both domain-specific knowledge and structural data.

Indexed as

Chemical and Drug Induced Liver InjuryDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceCardiotoxicityHumansKnowledge BasesMachine LearningRisk Assessmentcomputational toxicologydrug-induced cardiotoxicitydrug-induced liver injuryNew Approach Methodologies (NAMs)Quantitative Knowledge–Activity Relationships (QKARs)Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationships (QSARs)

Identifiers

PMID41025529
PMCPMC12646586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.