Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41025487›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American Heart Association2025

Evolving Perspectives in Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation: Why Sex Matters.

Edouard Long, Minji Ho, Sarah Guo, Tanisha Rajah, Sara Volpi, Narain Moorjani, Jason Ali, Francis C Wells, Antonio Bivona, Vassilios Avlonitis and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Edouard LongFaculty of Life Sciences and Medicine King's College London London UK.ORCID 0009-0002-1008-7966
Minji HoFaculty of Life Sciences and Medicine King's College London London UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6468-9199
Sarah GuoSchool of Clinical Medicine University of Cambridge Cambridge UK.ORCID 0009-0003-8210-5673
Tanisha RajahSchool of Medical Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4071-5986
Sara VolpiDepartment of Cardiac Surgery St Thomas' Hospital London UK.
Narain MoorjaniDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Royal Papworth Hospital Cambridge UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3025-2175
Jason AliDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Royal Papworth Hospital Cambridge UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2146-0711
Francis C WellsDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery Royal Papworth Hospital Cambridge UK.
Antonio BivonaThe Essex Cardiothoracic Centre Basildon Hospital Basildon UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5593-9240
Vassilios AvlonitisDepartment of Cardiac Surgery St Thomas' Hospital London UK.ORCID 0009-0003-3972-9130
Gianluca LuccheseDepartment of Cardiac Surgery St Thomas' Hospital London UK.
Rajdeep BilkhuDepartment of Cardiac Surgery St Thomas' Hospital London UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5866-9001
Alessia RossiThe Essex Cardiothoracic Centre Basildon Hospital Basildon UK.
Paolo BoscoDepartment of Cardiac Surgery St Thomas' Hospital London UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing body of evidence investigating sex differences in the presentation, assessment, and outcomes of patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) undergoing mitral valve surgery. It has been shown that women present at older ages, with more comorbidities and more severe symptoms. Compared with male patients, female patients have longer intervals to surgery, lower rates of surgery, and receive fewer mitral valve repairs (as opposed to replacements). On imaging, left ventricular cavity sizes and many quantitative measures of MR severity differ significantly by sex, and current guidelines do not account for this. While sex differences in surgical outcomes have been documented, these are largely limited to primary MR and are based on older studies, underscoring the need for further research. Data on sex differences in transcatheter interventions for MR are inconclusive and heterogeneous, complicating comparisons to surgery. To address these disparities, sex-specific thresholds for intervention in primary MR, standardization of the quantification of MR severity by sex, and further prospective studies are required. As we move into an era of precision medicine, it is critical to recognize sex as a key determinant of cardiovascular care. In patients undergoing surgery for MR, further research should evaluate whether current intervention thresholds and management pathways are appropriately tailored to female patients.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationMitral ValveMitral Valve InsufficiencyFemaleHumansMaleRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexSex FactorsTreatment Outcomecardiac surgerymitral regurgitationoutcomessex differences

Identifiers

PMID41025487
PMCPMC12684544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.