ReviewJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Evolving Perspectives in Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation: Why Sex Matters.
Review in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a growing body of evidence investigating sex differences in the presentation, assessment, and outcomes of patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) undergoing mitral valve surgery. It has been shown that women present at older ages, with more comorbidities and more severe symptoms. Compared with male patients, female patients have longer intervals to surgery, lower rates of surgery, and receive fewer mitral valve repairs (as opposed to replacements). On imaging, left ventricular cavity sizes and many quantitative measures of MR severity differ significantly by sex, and current guidelines do not account for this. While sex differences in surgical outcomes have been documented, these are largely limited to primary MR and are based on older studies, underscoring the need for further research. Data on sex differences in transcatheter interventions for MR are inconclusive and heterogeneous, complicating comparisons to surgery. To address these disparities, sex-specific thresholds for intervention in primary MR, standardization of the quantification of MR severity by sex, and further prospective studies are required. As we move into an era of precision medicine, it is critical to recognize sex as a key determinant of cardiovascular care. In patients undergoing surgery for MR, further research should evaluate whether current intervention thresholds and management pathways are appropriately tailored to female patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.