Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41025409›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2025

Classifying hypopneas as obstructive or central can enhance transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation therapy patient selection and outcomes.

Kara Dupuy-McCauley, Alan R Schwartz, Shahrokh Javaheri, Robin Germany, Scott McKane, Timothy I Morgenthaler

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01816776 (A Randomized Trial Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of the remedē® System in Patients With Central Sleep Apnea), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01816776 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Trial Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of the remedē® System in Patients With Central Sleep Apnea

TypeinterventionalSponsorRespicardia, Inc.Ran2013 to 2017Enrolled151ConditionsSleep Apnea, Central, Sleep Disordered Breathing, Heart FailureArmsTreatment Group (transvenous stimulation of the phrenic nerve), Control Group (Optimal Medical Therapy)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The importance of classifying central hypopneas: a call to action.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kara Dupuy-McCauleyCenter for Sleep Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Alan R SchwartzUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Shahrokh JavaheriDivision of Pulmonary and Sleep, Bethesda North Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Robin GermanyZOLL Respicardia, Inc, Minnetonka, Minnesota.
Scott McKaneZOLL Respicardia, Inc, Minnetonka, Minnesota.
Timothy I MorgenthalerCenter for Sleep Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesWhile not all sleep laboratories distinguish between obstructive and central hypopneas, recent research suggests that patients may receive an incorrect primary diagnosis without this effort. The remedē System Pivotal Trial studied transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation in patients with moderate-to-severe central sleep apnea. Entry criteria required apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 20 events/h with central apnea index greater than obstructive apnea index and obstructive apneas < 20% of AHI but did not classify hypopneas. This analysis re-examined sleep studies from the trial to assess hypopnea classification impact on candidacy and treatment outcomes.

methodsHypopneas were classified as central vs obstructive by a sleep core laboratory following a modified version of American Academy of Sleep Medicine recommended criteria. AHI composition was assessed pre/post treatment.

resultsAt baseline, 91% (138/151) of patients had ≥ 50% of events classified as central accounting for hypopnea classification. If all hypopneas were assumed obstructive, only 63% (95/151) would have had ≥ 50% central events. The likelihood of achieving ≥ 50% AHI reduction increased with the percentage of baseline events that were central: responder rates were 37.5% for patients with < 50% central events, incrementally increasing to 76.5% for those with ≥ 90% central events. At 6 months, residual AHI predominantly consisted of obstructive hypopneas. Central events decreased by 89% with treatment (baseline median 32 events/h). Obstructive apneas and hypopneas increased by 2 and 3 events/h, respectively.

conclusionsDistinguishing central from obstructive hypopneas is required to accurately determine the proportion of central and obstructive breathing events, and is crucial for appropriate therapy selection and managing patient expectations about treatment outcomes. CLINICAL

trial registrationRegistry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Respicardia, Inc. Pivotal Trial of the remede System; URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01816776, Identifier: NCT01816776. CITATION: Dupuy-McCauley K, Schwartz AR, Javaheri S, Germany R, McKane S, Morgenthaler TI. Classifying hypopneas as obstructive or central can enhance transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation therapy patient selection and outcomes.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyPatient SelectionPhrenic NerveSleep Apnea, CentralSleep Apnea, ObstructiveAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolysomnographyTreatment Outcomecentral hypopneacentral sleep apneatransvenous phrenic nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41025409
PMCPMC12670611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.